Skip to main content

Social status

I'm going to be revisiting the way levels are designed, bringing along some knowledge that I picked up while doing some basic 2D tilesets for another of my projects. I'm not sure how it's going to turn out yet, but it could be much better than the current tilesets, and allow different heights in different areas of the level. I'll have to do a bit of testing to see if it works, but better to do it now before I get to much further in. This could be something that really adds to the design of the game.

Anyway, while doing that I've been working on the rule set. One thing that has opened up is the idea of professions, and what they mean to roleplaying.

In medieval times, social status was incredibly important. If a knight and his squire went on a quest, guess who would get all the credit, and guess who would do most of the work. If a man is in a battle and his bishop is there behind him, it would take complete panic for the man to run away before th bishop. If your king tells you to rid him of a troublesome priest, guess who's going to have no head in the morning.

With all that in mind, I'm working on a system of social status. There will be a range from AAA to X. (Though I'll probably augment this with an integer value to make it easier to code).



Where you are on the ladder will determine how others react to you, and to a certain extent, how you must react to others. This also fits in to the Faction idea I've been brewing up. The outlaw factions have ratings of XXX, XX or X. So an evil dragon would have more status than an evil priest within their own faction, but both would be below the merest beggar to a member of the lawful faction.

So far there are only two factions described here, Lawful and Outlaw, but later there will be other factions introduced such as revolutionaries, secret societies, cults etc... These will use a "secret" status factor, which could over ride your social status when dealing with other members of the faction. So for example, if a doctor was a member of a secret cult, he'd have to bow down to an evil priest of the cult even though the priest's position as an outlaw would usually make him less than scum.

It would be possible to disguise your social standing with the right skills, or even so, you'd be able to pose as a higher or lower member of your "band" without too much trouble when dealing with outsiders (so a beggar might pose as laborer in front of a Duke to avoid being flogged for vagrancy, or a prince could easily pretend to be a minor aristocrat when dealing with bandits if he wanted to reduce his ransom).

As usual one of the things I like about this system is how it helps to model a complex system with numbers, allowing me to open it up to procedural generation. It'll make it much easier to generate roleplay situations through the interactions of status and subordination.

It also makes some of the more interesting professions worth playing. Nominally priests are just religious scholars with few useful skills (They don't get healing spells or Undead Turning ability in this game), but their social status makes then good leaders able to bolster morale, and also good diplomats.

Later I'm going to revisit the table to define professions more clearly within the gameworld and to give starting bonuses and skills for each one.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Advice needed on tilesets...

I need some advice on which is the best way to handle building the dungeon. Right now I'm using prefabs for my dungeon, they have a north south east and west section for each "room": The basic tileset. This has several advantages, and also several disadvantages. Firstly I can have curved rooms, I can have tunnels and other interesting shapes. The tilesets can look quite nice with a little work. On the other hand I can't easily get the navigation data before building the map and once the map has been built I can't make changes to the layout, like having active pit traps or believable secret doors. Although the rooms are interesting, they are quite repetitive, and it takes a lot of effort to make even a few different variations. Also rooms are constrained to one size. A newer version of the tileset with a lot of variant parts for making more interesting rooms. To create a tile set is a real headache too. Planning how to lay out the UVs, trying to cra
7 comments
Read more

Upstairs / Downstairs.

I've decided to make my prefabs multilevel. Later this should allow me to add pit traps and other great stuff. It also makes it easier to line up stairs so that you can exit them on the same co-ordinates where you entered them. The prefab editor is pretty much finished, it just needs some code for loading up prefabs from a saved dictionary, so that they can be checked or edited. The entries will need to be forwards compatible, so I'll be loading each tile and then translating the indexes to a new array, that way if I add extra indexes or extra info (like traps or puzzles) I'll be able to update existing prefabs to work with the new standard. Click for a video.
6 comments
Read more

Video Diary 8

Things are moving along well, there's been a lot of progress on the action manager side of things. Actions have finally moved to the UI, so you can initiate actions by clicking the appropriate button. I've set up some dummy actions to show what happens visually when actions are taken, but the actual dice rolls and such are yet to be integrated. The UI objects are also being added, though some are non functional or empty at the moment. Click on the image to see this week's development video. Every time I add something big I also add about a dozen small things. Like the selection box visualization. Previously this was using render.drawline, and old fashioned Blender function which can be impossible to see at certain resolutions, or at certain frequencies. I replaced it with a function that adds planes of the right size and scale in the right location. I also made all characters a little bigger. I still need to do some work with vectors and final target locations t
3 comments
Read more