Skip to main content

Bresenham line for LOS.

I spent some time today optimizing and modularizing the script I've been using to prepare it for having more than one player character. I also moved the mini map to an overlay scene.
Finally I started doing some tests on LOS.

Originally I had thought of using raycasting LOS, as this is a 3d game, I may as well take advantage of the power of a modern PC right? But after some consideration I'll be using the Bresenham line drawing algorithm to check for line of sight in the game and I've also been thinking of how I can use it in path finding. It is rather a nice algorithm and the worst part about it I can see is that it sometimes draws rather ugly lines when they veer near to the vertical or horizontal.

Here's an example of the LOS in game:


It's just an illustration of course so in the final game there won't be any indicators, the slime will just not be visible to the player. the beauty of using this implementation is that I don't have to do any ray-casting. I just check the walk dictionary (which includes both walkable squares and flyable squares) for each enemy in range and if any point on the line is not in the dictionary the chosen object is not visible.

I've read a little about using the algorithm for pathfinding too, but I'm not sure I'll be able to get it to work with non diagonal movement (which is a corner stone of my game). Lets wait and see.

 EDIT: After some experiments I've decided that diagonal movement is perhaps OK after all. I'll be doing some fixes to make sure that players and enemies don't try to cut corners through the scenery, but most of that should be possible to handle by modifying the walk meshes anyway. The Line algorithm works really well with pathfinding creating fairly natural looking diagonal paths and cutting down on processing time a lot compared to A*. One thing I specifically want to avoid is players or enemies squeezing between a wall corner and another player/NPC or moving diagonally in to a square which can't be reached by regular NSEW movement.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Make your game models POP with fake rim lighting.

I was watching one of my son's cartoons today and I noticed they models were using serious amounts of simulated rim lighting. Even though it wasn't a dark scene where you'd usually see such an effect, the result was actually quite effective.



The white edge highlighting and ambient occluded creases give a kind of high contrast that is similar to, but different from traditional comic book ink work.


I'll be honest, I don't know if there's a specific term for this effect in 3d design, since my major at university was in traditional art. I learned it as part of photography.


You can find plenty of tutorials on "what is rim lighting" for photography. It basically means putting your main sources of light behind your subject so that they are lit around the edges. It can produce very arresting photographs, either with an obvious effect when used on a dark subject...


..,or as part of a fully lit scene to add some subtle highlights. See how alive the subject look…

How to... build a strong art concept.

So you want to make some art assets for your game. The first on the list is a Steampunk Revolver for your main character to shoot up Cthulhu with. Quickly opening your internet browser you start with a Google image search. Ah, there is is!

It might be a good idea to find a few influences so you don't accidentally end up copying a famous design.


Just mash them up and you're ready to go! Off to your favorite modeling program.
But wait! isn't there more to building a strong design concept than that?

Of course there is.
One of the diseases of modern design is that of recursion. Everything is a copy of a copy of a copy. This is especially a problem with "historical" concepts. Over the course of that recursive process the concept becomes infected with modern design elements, and ends up looking very similar to everything else that anyone else has ever made.
If you want to come up with a really fresh idea, you have to get beyond secondary references and go look at real …

Rockets

I finished working on the code for adding foliage and having some extra time I decided to experiment with the code for rockets.

The original idea I had was that rockets would be large vehicle components that can be fired very quickly, regardless of how much manpower is used for reloading.






They would use up a lot of ammo, so they would run dry after a short but devastating barrage.
The problem here is that it's easy to take advantage of this by adding a lot of ammo, which is much smaller than in bulk than the rockets.

There's also the problem of firing large caliber rockets. In real life rockets of up to 30cm were used, but I think that will be too powerful for the scale of combat in this game.



lol. Somehow that one trooper survived the mother of all explosions...

A 30cm rocket could contain nearly 30KG of explosive. That would be a very large explosion.

I've tried to balance the game by using a simple equation to make bigger guns more powerful, but hopefully not too powerf…