Skip to main content

Real VS Fake: lighting.

In a video game, what is real?

This is, strangely, a question that infects many discussions about making games, much more so that those about playing games.

Well, some things can be modeled somewhat realistically; ray tracing, shadow casting, physics, real time reflections, on the fly destructible or deformable terrain, goal orientated action planning AI... These are all "realistic" approaches" to making games, or you might say simulation based approaches. Other times people use tricks; pre-baked lighting, animated pseudo-physics, on-rails movement, scripted AI, matcap reflections... These are all cheats, to save development time and processing power. They don't simulate real word physics or behavior but simply try to mimic the results.

Players of games are rarely concerned with with such things. Everyone who plays a game knows deep down that it is not real, and they don't expect it to behave realistically. Sometimes they get annoyed with games which show bad faith, enemies which respawn inside a locked room. Guns with infinite bullets. Cars which don't dent or scratch when you crash them at 200MPH. Who wouldn't get annoyed? We've got used to better.

But in other cases things such as shadow casting lights... If you've played Diablo 3, a AAA modern game, you might not have noticed that there's only one shadow casting light in the scene, and that shines from above the player. None of the other lights cast shadows. How does no one notice that? Someone asked me today; "Why don't you make your lighting system better, more like Diablo 3?"

Actually right now my lighting system is much more sophisticated than Diablo 3. I have multiple shadowcasting lights in the scene, casting "soft" shadows, unlike the hard edges shadows of Diablo. But I wonder if I'm wasting my efforts there.

Look at the picture above.
It seems like there is a sword on the floor, glowing with light. Actually, the sword isn't glowing. It's just a simple plane with a texture that has additive type transparency. A trick that predates real time shadows, you can see it used frequently in games from the last century! If you move close you'll see that it doesn't illuminate the player, it doesn't cast shadows...

Diablo 3 is packed with tricks like that. simple 2d shaders, particle effects etc... But the basic lighting is very simple indeed. When people praise the lighting, they are really praising the fake effects, not the lighting setup itself.

So maybe I should just focus on adding more cheesy visual effects and shaders instead of trying to simulate real torchlight. In the end, who's going to notice it but me? If the game has a single unidirectional shadow lamp, no one is going to notice, and the result will be much faster on low end computers.


  1. Very simple comment from my distant past:
    "It is irrelevant how you do it, just as long as it looks right to you"
    So take whatever shortcuts, do whatever you need, and cut every corner to get it right :)


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Make your game models POP with fake rim lighting.

I was watching one of my son's cartoons today and I noticed they models were using serious amounts of simulated rim lighting. Even though it wasn't a dark scene where you'd usually see such an effect, the result was actually quite effective.

The white edge highlighting and ambient occluded creases give a kind of high contrast that is similar to, but different from traditional comic book ink work.

I'll be honest, I don't know if there's a specific term for this effect in 3d design, since my major at university was in traditional art. I learned it as part of photography.

You can find plenty of tutorials on "what is rim lighting" for photography. It basically means putting your main sources of light behind your subject so that they are lit around the edges. It can produce very arresting photographs, either with an obvious effect when used on a dark subject...

..,or as part of a fully lit scene to add some subtle highlights. See how alive the subject look…

How to... build a strong art concept.

So you want to make some art assets for your game. The first on the list is a Steampunk Revolver for your main character to shoot up Cthulhu with. Quickly opening your internet browser you start with a Google image search. Ah, there is is!

It might be a good idea to find a few influences so you don't accidentally end up copying a famous design.

Just mash them up and you're ready to go! Off to your favorite modeling program.
But wait! isn't there more to building a strong design concept than that?

Of course there is.
One of the diseases of modern design is that of recursion. Everything is a copy of a copy of a copy. This is especially a problem with "historical" concepts. Over the course of that recursive process the concept becomes infected with modern design elements, and ends up looking very similar to everything else that anyone else has ever made.
If you want to come up with a really fresh idea, you have to get beyond secondary references and go look at real …


I finished working on the code for adding foliage and having some extra time I decided to experiment with the code for rockets.

The original idea I had was that rockets would be large vehicle components that can be fired very quickly, regardless of how much manpower is used for reloading.

They would use up a lot of ammo, so they would run dry after a short but devastating barrage.
The problem here is that it's easy to take advantage of this by adding a lot of ammo, which is much smaller than in bulk than the rockets.

There's also the problem of firing large caliber rockets. In real life rockets of up to 30cm were used, but I think that will be too powerful for the scale of combat in this game.

lol. Somehow that one trooper survived the mother of all explosions...

A 30cm rocket could contain nearly 30KG of explosive. That would be a very large explosion.

I've tried to balance the game by using a simple equation to make bigger guns more powerful, but hopefully not too powerf…